Express Yourself
Why We Must Stop Referring to Enslaved People as ‘Slaves’
How we use language matters
I have a new pet project, and it appears to be a cause taken up by countless other word enthusiasts. I’m finding Wikipedia articles where people are referred to as “slaves” and editing the entries to refer to them as “enslaved persons” or “victims of enslavement.” In my editing, “masters” and “owners” become “enslavers.” In this way, enslavers rightfully join the ranks of rapists and colonizers throughout human history. References to “ownership” become references to “then legally permissible, immoral forced enslavement” and so on. Sometimes I come up with new terminology on the fly.
It’s not just transatlantic slavery that gets this treatment. Enslaved people in the Bible and throughout history are liberated from their proverbial word bondage to the word “slave” by me and other editors. We recognize how dangerous and insidious thoughtless words, when left unanalyzed, can be.
I know these preferred phrases can be clumsy and, well, wordy, but they strike me as just more accurate and necessary. They should strike you this way, too.
Since I was a child, the word “slave” has always rubbed me the wrong way. As a student, I remember thinking how wrong it was that the enslaved…
